Friday, 21 October 2016

Ebun Olu-Adegboruwa Esq Asks: Will Mahmoud Step Down Pending the Outcome of his Election Dispute?



PRESS RELEASE ON WHY NBA CANNOT ASK JUDGES TO STEP ASIDE BY EBUN OLU-ADEGBORUWA ESQ

I have read of the suggestion by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association to the extent that judges who are currently being investigated for alleged corruption should step aside. The NBA comment is a "suggestion", because constitutionally, the NBA has no power of discipline over judges and it is not within the aims and objectives of the NBA to assume the power of discipline over judges.

In the case of My Lord the Hon Justice Ngwuta, he has deposed to an oath, barring the details of the disgusting attempts made by members of the ruling APC to pervert the course of justice, involving two of the party's serving ministers. Do we ask such a judge to step aside so that the ruling party will laugh over him, or what?

Now, section 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution states that every person charged with a criminal offense is presumed innocent until the contrary is proved. This presumption of innocence, offered to all citizens of Nigeria, is even in relation to when the citizen has been charged to court, and not speculations and half truths, based on 'sting' operations.
In the case of the judges, not a single charge has been filed in court yet, with some proof of evidence, showing some prima facie evidence of the allegations.

Very recently, the ruling APC bared its wicked fangs against the legislative arm, by accusing the leadership of the Senate, of forging its own rules. Eventually, a very frivolous charge was filed in court, with all the fanfare and media hype. The charge has now been withdrawn, for want of evidence. One would have imagined the crisis in the Senate had the leadership bowed to pressure from the APC, for its leadership to step aside, on account of the manifestly frivolous case. Now it is the turn of judges and all that the NBA can do is to seek to railroad them into compulsory resignation, even without trial.

The NBA is already privy to the decision and stand point of the National Judicial Council, to the extent that the judges will not be suspended based on mere unproven allegations from the DSS, which has now become the security wing of the ruling APC. This decision is binding on the NBA, whose accredited representatives were in attendance at the various sessions of the NJC when its decision was taken.

I noticed that the NBA executives recently visited Aso Rock Villa and they were hosted by the Presidency, and so the latest turn around by the NBA President in capitulating to pressure from politicians and the ruling APC, to disown the judges, who by tradition, are unofficial members of the Bar, bears no justification whatsoever.

The Motto of the NBA is to promote the rule of law and due process, and so, I cannot see how judges who have only been accused of corruption without any proof or criminal charge, can be asked to abandon their constitutional duties because they refused to do the bidding of the ruling APC government and its members.

The NBA is indirectly advocating a system of presumption of innocence, which is contrary to our Constitution. For instance, there have been several allegations arising from the recently concluded NBA elections. There are even cases pending in court. Do we then say that based on these allegations, the NBA President should step aside? Indeed it was after these allegations and court cases that the NBA executives were sworn in and inaugurated. 

There is no basis for the suggestion by the NBA President for judges who are being investigated to step aside. It will only open a floodgate for frivolous allegations and petitions against even innocent judicial officers, by litigants who may not be pleased with certain decisions of the judges.

Rather than ask the judges to step aside, the NBA should proceed to constitute a legal team for judges who are presently under trial and then to demand for an independent commission of inquiry, into the weighty allegations of indictment and persecution, made by judges.

We cannot afford a situation whereby politicians who have lost cases before judges would turn around to instigate the law against those judges as a way of punishing them or to get rid of them, to pave the way for their preferred decisions, in political cases. As things are now, judges across the land dare not give decisions unfavorable to the ruling party, or the powers that be, contrary to the established norm that everyone is equal before the law.

The NBA cannot be seen to condone or indeed encourage the intimidation of judges, or the harassment and ridiculing of the judiciary by politicians who have lost cases in the open court, after failing to have their way through attempted corrupt enrichment, of the judges.

The incongruity of NBA's suggestion is made more manifest when it sees nothing wrong in the Ministers indicted by the judges continuing in office whereas the judges are to step aside. Already, Hon Justice Adeniyi Ademola has withdrawn from the Dasuki case, thus helping to achieve the ultimate design of the APC and the DSS.

The sudden turn around by the NBA does not represent the aggregate opinion of all reasonable lawyers who are lovers of equity, justice, rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

The NBA should be at the forefront of the campaign to ensure that decisions of our courts are not based on or influenced by nocturnal manipulations of politicians and litigants. And with the appeals of States like Abia and Cross River pending for determination in the Supreme Court, one can guess the kind of pressure that My Lords the justices of the Supreme Court will be battling with.

Whereas I support and hold the executives of the NBA in very high regards, there is however no basis for the call for judges being investigated to step aside, given all the circumstances of the cases.

The NBA should rise up to rescue the judiciary from manipulators, from monsters and from predators. The APC will not be the first political party to rule Nigeria, whereby all institutions and persons perceived to be in opposition must be cowed, destroyed and silenced.

And I'm praying fervently and hoping that the NBA will one day brace up to ask the President and his executive team to step aside, for failing to fulfill their campaign promises, for running the economy of Nigeria into recession, for disobedience to orders of courts, for the brutal massacre of innocent Shiite and IPOB (Biafra) members, and for several other dictatorial policies of the government.

Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, Esq


Life without Christ is crisis

Sent from my iPhone

Sunday, 16 October 2016

WOMEN GROUPS ISSUE STATEMENT ON BUHARI'S MISOGYNIST COMMENTS



For Immediate Release
RE: NFF Press Statement on President Buhari’s Public Misogynistic, Derogatory and Demeaning Comments about His Wife; Aisha Buhari.
 Lagos, 16th October 2016.
The NFF and its partners, totally reject and condemn in strong terms the comments made by Nigeria’s President Mohammad Buhari on Friday the 14th of October 2016 in response to his wife’s interview on Hausa Service of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Mrs. Aisha Buhari, during the said interview publicly expressed discontent with Mr. President for not living up to expectations. In response to certain statements made by Aisha, President Buhari was quoted by the Associated Press (AP) as saying during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Ms. Angela Merkel, that “his wife should be taking care of his kitchen, living room and the other room” —meaning his bedroom. In his own words, President Buhari said, “I don’t know which party my wife belongs to, but she belongs to my kitchen and my living room and the other room”.

Mr. President’s comment connotes a nostalgic and repugnant invocation of historical patriarchal oppression and subjugation of Nigerian women, which has over the past alienated and denied Nigerian women access and a level playing ground to compete equally with their male counterparts both in public and personal spaces. Need we remind Mr. President about the role and contributions of women in our nation building vis-Ă -vis the socio-cultural, economic and political development of our beloved Nigeria?  We Nigerian women alongside our male counterparts have throughout the history of the development of this country resisted and will continue to resist every attempt made to diminish our contributions to the development of this nation. We will continue to fights against the entrenchment of patriarchal, socio-cultural and religious misogynistic structures that oppress and demean the status of women in our society. This demeaning statement violates right to dignity of every woman, recognised in section 34 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution.

It is notable that Mr. President’s condescending comment relegating his wife’s role exclusively to his ’’kitchen and the other room’’ was made during a state visit to Germany, a first world nation with advanced democracy, headed by a woman (Ms. Angela Merkel). Ms. Merkel serves as a clear example that women can attain to the highest leadership position anywhere in the world if given the right support and opportunity. Ms. Merkel would not have become the German Chancellor if she as a woman was solely relegated to the kitchen or the other room. Ms. Merkel, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Michelle Bachelet, Thersa May, Doris Leuthard and other women in similar position demonstrates that women just like men, are capable of making important decisions in the ‘boardrooms and conference rooms’. 

Mr. President Sir, we Nigerian women hereby categorically state that we are no less important than our male citizens. We matter equally. It is inexcusable and utterly condemnable to refer to the first lady of Nigeria and indeed any other woman as belonging to the ’’kitchen’’. It may interest you to know that Nigerian women make up 42.2% of the labour force (World Bank, 2014). Nigerian women contribute close to 70% of agricultural workforce (African Development Bank, 2015). Millions of Nigerian women are entrepreneurs, doctors, engineers, teachers, lawyers, farmers, traders among others. Nigerian women including your wife Aisha, constitute 50% of the country’s population and comments such as yours can never diminish or undermine our status and contribution to national development and growth. Mr, President Sir, your role as a statesman and leader of a polarized country such as ours, connotes that you must never been seen either in public or private to support ideas and positions that stifles 50% of the citizens of the country you head.  We equally admonish your follow up comments/confirmation of your earlier position to a journalist that your wife’s sole duty is to ‘take care of you’ is equally unacceptable. We believe that you are not physically disabled or incapacitated to warrant 24hours personal care and if that is the case, may we suggest you seek qualified paid professional care.

Mr. President it is needless to remind you that Aisha your wife, is a highly educated, influential and focused woman, from a family of politicians. We recall her contributions and indeed the contribution of other Nigerian women to the success of the 2015 elections, which ushered in your government. Mrs. Aisha Buhari successfully rallied the support of the mass of Nigerian women who make up approximately 50% of the total number of voters that voted to put your government in power. Need we remind you that women actively participated in political rallies, campaigns, voters’ registration and actual voting exercises. We have not forgotten about the promises you made to women during your election campaign speeches, we are eagerly waiting for you to fulfil them starting from appointing women equally in your ministerial cabinet.
                                                                                                  
The NFF and its partners are saddened and worried to note that the present political dispensation has the lowest representation of women in public office. Women make up roughly 8% of the overall membership of the legislature and only 7% of ministers currently serving in your cabinet are women. This is against the 31% in the immediate past administration.  We wonder if this dismal representation of women in decision making in your government has a direct link to your personal opinion of women and their role in the society. The dismal role of women in decision-making positions in this present administration is extremely discomforting.  Nigerian women were even further assaulted by the rejection of the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill (GEOP) by members of Nigeria’s Senate on Tuesday the 15th of March 2016.  The GEOP Bill seeks to guarantee the rights of women to access equal opportunities in employment and education. It also seeks to guarantee equal rights to inheritance for both male and female children.

We note that in other progressive democracies in Africa, in countries like Rwanda women make up 63.8% in the Lower house of Assembly and 38.5% in the senate. In South Africa women represent 41.9% and 35.2% respectively. In Burundi women represent 36.4% in the lower Assembly and 41.9% representation in senate. Even Zimbabwe has 31.5% and 37.5% respectively. In the Nigerian parliament as presently constituted, women represent a dismal 5.6% in the Lower Assembly and 6.5% in the senate. Very far from the agitated 35%, Affirmative Action provided for, in the National Gender Policy 2006.

The NFF and its partners will like to use this medium to commend the courage, sincerity, and audacity of Mrs. Aisha Buhari to speak up, upon sensing that the government is clearly deviating from delivering the electioneering promises it made to Nigerians. Never in our history as a nation have we had a woman in that position use her power to express an opinion that threatens even her personal comfort. We hereby use this medium to call on President Mohammad Buhari to immediately;
· Offer an unreserved public apology to his wife and indeed every Nigerian woman and girls for the disparaging and demeaning misogynistic comment made about confining the role of women in the society solely to the domestics.
·Take concrete actions to demonstrate his government’s commitment to actualizing 35% Affirmative Action in all government institutions, structures and decision-making positions.
·Demonstrate a clear road map of implementing the sustainable development goal especially goal 5 on Gender equality.
·Fulfill every electioneering promise made to Nigerian women and take steps to secure the lives of women and girls especially those in conflict situations.
·Show public support for women’s right and gender equality.
We also call on the leadership of Nigerian legislature, not to relent in its commitment to ensure the immediate passage of the re-introduced Gender and Equal Opportunities bill presently before the senate.

Signed,
Geraldyn Ezeakile
Nigerian Feminist Forum, Secretariat.
(+2348068864475)

Co-signed by:
1.    Women Africa (WA)
2.    Women Entrepreneurs Association of Nigera (WEAN)
3.    Centre for Mmadu on Human Rights (C4M)
4.    Alliances for Africa (AfA)
5.    Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP)
6.    Women Crisis Centre (WCC) Lesley Agams
7.    Equity Advocates (EQ)
8.    Echoes of Women In Africa (ECHOES)
9.    Arise Nigerian Women Foundation (ANWF)
10.                      Gender and Development Action (GADA)
11.                      Media Concern Initiative for Women and Children  (MCIWC)
12.                      Women’s Right and Health Project (WRAHP)
13.                      Vision Spring Initiatives (VSI)
14.                      Voice of Eve International (VOI)

About the Nigerian Feminist Forum (NFF)
The Nigerian Feminist Forum (NFF) is a biennial public policy forum that brings together feminists from the six geo-political zones, government officials, and other strategic partners to deliberate on issues of key concern to the development of and emancipation of women in Nigeria. We can be reached via email at;nigerianfeminist@gmail.com, nff@alliancesforafrica.org and via twitter: @nff2008

Retd JSC: Don't Need Corrupt Judges nor Corrupt Lawyers in the Legal Profession