Thursday, 25 February 2016

The Poll and Modu Sheriff: How to Win Elections


Really?  Fani-Kayode's campaign against APC being sympathetic to boko haram actually helped APC win the 2015 elections. Didn't it? Why is PDP now winning sympathy rather than the reverse?.

Come to think of it if the publicity secretary of your party is said to have collected N400Million  money meant for boko haram and Bello Haliru and others are labeled treasury looters  and the same party in this 2016, PDP beat APC in Benue State Senator David Mark emerged the latest. Before then PDP Governor of Bayelsa Dickson beat APC's Gov candidate even with APC at the centre, PDP won, because Nigerians do not believe APC is a great party. 
Magic wand being good governance.  Politicians prove it.  Govern well wherever you have won election and that truly wins any time. Maltreating vulnerable people is not exactly a sign of strength you know. Please kindly fight only just causes akin to the Amazon.
CA

Sheriff not best choice for PDP – Poll

Ali Modu Sheriff
14137
After the former Governor of Borno State, Ali Modu Sherrif, was named as the National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party on Tuesday, a debate emerged about his ability to move the party forward.
While some think it is a brilliant move, some others have a lot of reservation about it, saying it may even mean the end of the political party altogether. However, some others are indifferent about it.
When we asked our readers what they thought about PDP’s choice of Ali Modu Sherriff as the National Chairman at this time, 71.2 per cent of the respondents said he was not he best choice for the party.
Seventeen per cent of the respondents believed the former governor was the best man to move the party forward, while 11.8 per cent were indifferent about the decision.
Modu Poll
Those opposed to the choice said claims that the former governor was affiliated to Boko Haram made his emergence as national chairman negative for the PDP.
“His personality has been damaged following the unending crisis of Boko Haram; even though he might not have orchestrated the establishment of the group, there is the feeling that he is affiliated to them,” a respondent said.
Some, who said he was the best man for the job, were only being sarcastic about it, saying that the choice was positive because  it would ensure that the PDP never gets close to the presidency again.
“It is a boost to end PDP,” a respondent said.
“So that he will kill the party completely,” another said.
Supporters of the new PDP chairman argued among other things that he was capable of boosting the party’s profile in the North-East where the ruling All Progressives Party had huge following.
“He (Modu Sherrif) has lots of followership in the North; a place where the APC currently enjoys numerical advantage over all other parties. Besides, the man is legitimately financially loaded!,” a respondent said.

Another respondent said, “Senator Modu Sheriff is a politician of repute and integrity.I strongly believe, he has the capacity and intelligence to deliver PDP to the promise land.”
What do you think?

Tompolo and Lamorde Ibrahim



Tompolo’s  alleged crime was N14Billion marine contract executed by previous regime and so on.
Ibrahim Larmode’s N1Trillion recovered loots he was said to have diverted during the past regime.
Meaning Lamorde recovered these monies and re-stole it, a higher crime than the first class of theft.
Festus Keyamo make a note,  if Tompolo is answering to a contract, Lamorde must also answer.
Model the war to recover Nigeria’s looted treasury on the maiden of justice.
I hasten to add though that Tompolo had no right to have threatened you 2014-2015 with death.
Happily, he has seen that he has no power over life.
Having said that, I underscore the need to bring back Ibrahim Lamorde’s Loot.

Thank you


Senate wants ex-EFCC boss, Lamorde arrested

  • image: http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/Image/like.png
    like  (0 Likes)
image: http://cms.dailytrust.com.ng/cms/gall_content/2016/2/2016_2$largeimg25_Feb_2016_145625924.jpg
Senate wants ex-EFCC boss, Lamorde arrested
Ibrahim Lamorde
The Senate committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions on Thursday recommended the issuance of a warrant of arrest of the former chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde over alleged diversion of N1 trillion recovered by the commission.

Chairman of the Committee, Senator Samuel Anyanwu (PDP, Imo East) made the recommendation while delivering the report of his Committee on the petition by one Mr. George Uboh on the alleged diversion of the recovered funds.
Uboh had in his petition laid on the floor by Senator Peter Nwaoboshi (PDP, Delta North) accused Lamorde of diverting 95 percent of EFCC's recoveries in foreign currencies.
He also alleged that EFCC under Lamorde colluded with real estate companies to undervalue seized assets before they were sold to their cronies.
According to him, half of the assets seized from suspects by the EFCC were not reflected in the commission's exhibit records.

Anyanwu said Uboh has appeared before his Committee to defend his claims but that the former EFCC boss has refused to appear.
He said having waited for the appearance of Lamorde since 24th November, 2015, his committee concluded that the former EFCC boss wants to evade investigation.
 ”Consequently, the committee reasoned that the way to get the former EFCC chairman, Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde to appear before it was to invoke the powers of the Senate in section 89 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and compel his attendance.  Unless this is done, the National Assembly might be drawn into consequential disrepute in the future,” he said.

But the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu raised point of order, citing sections 88 & 89 of 1999 Constitution, saying the issue should not be discussed on the floor.
"So what is required here is for the committee to issue a warrant of arrest and then the President of the Senate will direct the Police to effect the arrest. It is not the business of the senate during the plenary to do so. Otherwise, we will be offending this part of the constitution,” he said. The Senate President, Bukola Saraki sustained Ekweremadu's point of order and asked the committee to oblige.

Read more at http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/news/general/senate-wants-ex-efcc-boss-lamorde-arrested/135312.html#fbXI9JjmhABHGIgg.99

Tarfa's N5Billion Privacy Suit Discontinued

Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/02/rickey-tarfa-withdraws-n5bn-suit/

 Not news that a senior advocate would file a fundamental rights suit and he withdrew it.
On Tuesday 16th Feb., 2016 PM, I sent this text message to our learned colleagues on my contact list.

“Tarfa admitted it, EFCC tags the N225,000= a bribe to Yunusa J., Tarfa called it a donation for the funeral rites of the  Judge’s father-in-law Alhaji Damasa.. . In law “donation” is an inducement so it is a form of bribery . Tarfa having admitted the essential components of the crime (bribery is a crime) it does not lie in his mouth to say breach of privacy. You cannot be involved in human trafficking and shipping children abroad and say privacy”?...”
A week after Tarfa files notice of discontinuance of his N5Billion breach of privacy lawsuit.  I am not taking credit for it afterall I am not a counsel to any of the parties except a public interest commentator.

But it is only a Lawyer Chief Olanipekun SAN that would show interest in a Tarfa’s case and they would not know how to define “bribery”. They didn’t even know that donation amounted to inducement in the circumstances of the matter until perhaps I pointed it out in my text messages to them. Then followed withdrawal of the lawsuit. There is still the other fundamental rights suit pending where a second affidavit was deposed to say Tarfa didn’t give N225,000 to Yunusa J., after plaintiff’s deposition that he did give the Judge the donation some of his friends contributed towards father-in-law’s. This morning’s critique shames the legion of unserious SAN of corrupt practices.  Look at the merit  of your case, try win some respect write clean pleadings and conduct your forensic advocacy unless these are no longer  SAN requirements nowadays. Scrap it then.

The masqurade is dancing naked in the market square. I guess his attempt to speak with and provide 'burial expenses' to the trial jugde failled, hence, the withdrawal of the suit. Nigerians are keeping a tab on his trial and his legion of shameless, corrupt and unserious SANs, who went to for a 'show of force' to intimidate the court the other time. Birds of the same feather... it's time Nigeria beam her search light on both the Bar and the Bench.
Vanguard Logo Vanguard News A Nigerian newspaper and Online version of the Vanguard, a daily publication in Nigeria covering Niger delta, general national news, politics, business, energy, sports, entertainment, fashion,lifestyle human interest stories, etc Home News Sports Politics Business Tech Entertainment Style Editorial Viewpoint More Breaking News Translate Select Language​▼

Rickey Tarfa withdraws N5bn suit On February 25, 20167:07 amIn NewsComments 52 Shares 3121 By Innocent Anaba Lagos lawyer, Mr. Rickey Tarfa, SAN, yesterday, withdrew the N5billion fundamental rights suit he filed against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, MTN Nigeria Communications Limited and others.

Tarfa had alleged the violation of his rights to privacy by the respondents. Other defendants in the suit were EFCC acting Chairman, Ibrahim Magu, Mrs. Rashidatou Abdou and Femi Falana, SAN. Following the withdrawal of the suit, the trial judge, Justice Mohammed Idris awarded a punitive cost of N10, 000 against Tarfa in favour of each of the five respondents.

Tarfa had filed the suit following his arrest on February 5 by EFCC operatives on the premises of the Lagos State High Court in Igbosere, where he allegedly hid two suspects in his car to prevent their arrest. His two mobile phones and his Mercedez Benz SUV with Registration No. KJA 700 CG, were confiscated by the EFCC. Tarfa alleged that the respondents violated his right to privacy by allegedly scrutinising his call logs.

He therefore urged the court to declare that the respondents violated his right protected by Section 37 of the Constitution, when, without a court order, MTN allegedly made the call log on his mobile line, 08034600000, available to the EFCC and the others respondents, who in turn allegedly released the information to Sahara Reporters and other online media.

Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/02/rickey-tarfa-withdraws-n5bn-suit/



 


On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Carol Ajie <carolajie@gmail.com> wrote:

Rickey Tarfa denies credited account belongs to a Judge On February 24, 201610:10 am

In News Comments 108 Shares 6611 By Innocent Anaba Lagos lawyer, Mr Rickey Tarfa, SAN, who initiated a N2.5billion fundamental rights suit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in which he is challenging his arrest and detention, as well the seizure of his phone and car, has told a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, that the N225,000 allegedly paid into Justice Mohammed Yunusa of a Federal High Court, Lagos, was a lie, as the said money was paid into the account of a former staff of the chambers, Mohammed Awwal Yunusa.

In an affidavit of urgency deposed to by Head of Chambers, Rickey Tarfa SAN and Co., Mr. Segun Odubela, he averred that a former staff of the chambers, Mohammed Awwal Yunusa, an indigene of Kogi State was the owner of the Access bank account the EFCC had earlier averred belonged to Justice Yunusa, where its alleged a sum of N225,000 was paid in by Rickey Tarfa as bribe. Mr. Odubela averred that Mohammed Yunusa was following the case of his former employer through media outlets where he immediately noticed that the account No. 0060351694 referred to in the counter affidavit as filed by EFCC in response to the substantive suit was his account number.

Mohammed Awwal Yunusa in his own deposition, averred that he recalled that a Rickey Tarfa’s Access bank counter cheque No. 00002065 dated January 7, 2014 for N225,000 was issued to him and he was paid as he collected the value in his Access bank account No 0060351694 held in his name, Mohammed Awwal Yunusa. He further averred that at the Abuja office at No 2, Librevile Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja on February 22, 2016, he was contacted by the office accountant, Mr. Samaila Malgwi, who had checked the office records and informed him that the cheque issued to him for N225,000 was the only cheque issued by Tarfa and Co. on January 7, 2014.

Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/02/rickey-tarfa-denies-credited-account-belongs-to-a-judge/

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

Atiku Warns Former AGF Adoke SAN





Abacha, Atiku and Adoke in a brawl over Malabu Oil Deal? Ha!
When 3 Greedy Nigerians Brawl, the god of mammon watches over.
Why didn’t they incorporate “Grade A-Greed un-Limited”.


The countless colleagues and their families victims of Adoke’s greed.

I received a letter addressed to the present AGF Malami,  I was copied. In it one of our colleagues asked Malami to help some pensioners from where AGF Adoke poorly stopped. Of all Adoke had from the tiny clique he formed the inept dept of (in)justice, still didn’t cure his mental poverty.


On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Carol Ajie <carolajie@gmail.com> wrote:



In letter to VP Osinbajo, ex-AGF Adoke, lies, muddles up Malabu oil scam matter

Bello Adoke
Bello Adoke
The immediate past Attorney General of the Federation, Mohammed Adoke, in a frantic move to avoid accounting for his unprofessional role in the transfer of $1.1 billion to an illegal company, Malabu Oil and Gas Limited for the sale of oil block OPL 245, has written to Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, deliberately muddling up details of the transaction.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) recently re-opened investigations into the scandal and had invited Mr. Adoke for questioning. Mr. Adoke is however yet to honour the agency’s invitation.
But in a desperate appeal for Mr. Osinbajo’s intervention in the matter, Mr. Adoke recycled the same catalogue of lies he had repeatedly circulated since his role in using the Federal Government as a platform for a secret deal with oil giants, Shell and Eni, to transfer the controversial fund to Malabu, an illegal company with fictitious directors and addresses, floated by a former Petroleum Minister and ex-convict, Dan Etete.
In the letter dated December 31, 2015, Mr. Adoke claimed he acted in the best interest of the country and accused those he described as agents of the Sani Abacha family; Lawal Abba, an associate of former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, and news website, specifically PREMIUM TIMES and Sahara Reporters, of orchestrating smear campaign against him.
PREMIUM TIMES had in the past published a series of extensive investigations revealing that Mr. Adoke acted unprofessionally and had consistently lied to cover up his involvement in the fraudulent transaction.
Contrary to his claim in the letter to Mr. Osinbajo that “the transaction aforementioned was legitimate, transparent and well documented, and above all, self-explanatory,” PREMIUM TIMES extensive investigations into the deal had revealed that it was fraught with corruption and monumental fraud.
While Mr. Adoke tried to deflect attention from his involvement in the scandal by alleging that the Abacha family was sponsoring a smear campaign against him, he deliberately avoided addressing the core issues of the controversial transaction.
Firstly, Mr Adoke avoided addressing the question of the illegal status of Malabu Oil and Gas, the company to which he authorized the transfer of $1.1 billion.
While Mr Adoke continued to insist that the deal was illegal, the Corporate Affairs Commission, an agency on whose board Mr Adoke once sat, had placed a caveat on the company’s file after being briefed by the EFCC that the company was under investigation and that its record had been breached.
Also, before the payment was made, Mr Adoke was informed that he was dealing with fraudsters.
A letter titled “Unauthorised alterations of Malabu Oil and Gas Limited Ownership Structure,” signed by Abdullahi Haruna, a principal solicitor at a law firm, Onekutu, Haruna and Co., was handed over to Mr Adoke in May 2011 when he assumed duties as attorney general, warning him that people he was dealing with had manipulated and falsified company records with the Corporate Affairs Commission.
Mr. Haruna also briefed Mr. Adoke of the history of Malabu and the alleged criminality of Mr. Etete.
“We humbly request that the Honourable Attorney General intervene in these negotiations and prevent the conclusion of the transaction on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentation,” Mr. Adoke was told.
Separate investigations by PREMIUM TIMES and the EFCC revealed that the ownership structure of the company was illegally changed and a fictitious new director, Kweku Amafegha, which was created by Mr. Etete, introduced with six million shares.
By that act, Mr. Etete and other promoters of Malabu violated section 563 of the companies and allied matters act and are liable to at least seven years in prison by virtue of sections 190 and 436 of the criminal code act.
“Section 190 and Section 436 (b) of the Criminal Code Act is applicable to the conduct of the promoter of Malabu, in that a false representation or declaration was made to induce the Corporate Affairs Commission to issue an incorporation certificate,” said Jiti Ogunye, a Lagos based lawyer.
A PREMIUM TIMES investigation also revealed that all the office addresses provided to authorities by Malabu were fake.
But Mr. Adoke, in his letter to the Vice President, did not explain why, as the most senior legal officer of the last government, he approved the payment of such a huge sum of money to a company enmeshed in corruption of which he received advance warnings.
Further, Mr Adoke also need to explain why he negotiated with Mr. Etete when he (Etete) was never listed as a director of the company.
Another important fact of the transaction Mr. Adoke avoided talking about was the haste at which the transaction was concluded with Mr Etete.
PREMIUM TIMES investigation at the time revealed that Mr Adoke, in cohort with a former Minister of State for Finance, Yerima Ngama, on August 16, 2011, hurriedly and secretly authorised the transfer of the money to Malabu from a Nigerian government account with JP Morgan International Bank, a day before the assumption of duties of the immediate past Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.
Malabu subsequently transferred the money to other phony companies with falsified addresses in what the EFCC described at the time as a “cloudy scene associated with fraudulent dealings”.

Breaking news: Lawsuit Against NBA Closed Today!




Lawsuit against NBA Closed Today 23/2/2016  in the presence of Samuel Zibiri SAN and other learned colleagues. Also I saw Sunday Ameh SAN in court  and Ikeji  Esq but they were all in different matters Tues 23rd Feb 2016. Two hours ago or so, some of us left the high court feeling elated and vindicated.

STARWOOD VS- NBA
In 2013, during the regime of NBA President Okey Wali SAN, I wrote on behalf of my clients to settle an outstanding debt. NBA Section on Business Law had incurred the debt previous years before Mr Wali came to the saddle. In 2013, my clients handed me the instructions.
I thought Wali would consider mediation so I tried to settle it amicably but when he made a simple matter complicated and thought SBL should, we filed a writ of summons under the un-defended list against NBA President NBA, GS, RT. They filed a notice of intention to defend and a counter affidavit. Thereafter the NBA filed a Motion dated 30th Jan 2014 to protest that the court processes were not served on them.
It is not all the time an opponent files something a lawyer should respond except of course on points of law.  When in 2015, NBA Lawyer argued his Motion dated 30th Jan 2014, we replied on points of law. 



1.    That the NBA’s objection is frivolous, vexatious, be dismissed.

2.    That Kisari Investment Ltd vs- La Terminal Co Ltd (2001)  FWLR (PART 66) p766 at 785 relied on by NBA decided that once service of originating processes  was effected at the defendants’ office address, it is proper in the eyes of the law and therefore cannot protest.

3.    That the processes were served by Bailiff Bolus at the NBA National Secretariat at N0. 24, Oro-Ago Street, Off Muhammadu Buhari Way Abuja and received by the Director of Admin at the time Mr Osita Okoro  on 26/7/2013 and the defendants having responded thereto by filing a notice of intention to defend on 2/8 and  a counter affidavit wherein NBA said it is NBA Section on Business Law that should pay the debt and not the National NBA and we said NBA SBL is not a juristic person. Hence the parent body must be held liable for the acts of one of her arms of administration at the national level.


After the argument, the court adjourned for ruling and that was when NBA took seriously the suggestion for mediation and settlement and it paid off. However, today the court read her ruling anyway and dismissed NBA’s application bearing in mind NBA told a lie when it said it was not served. 



Anyway I have told the court because NBA stopped attending court after we got NBA’s cheque paid NBA’s legitimate debt, I on my own informed the Judge today 23/2/2016 that sums have been paid and case closed.  Judge Ordered accordingly


Thank you but next time do not treat or take mediation tips as a sign of weakness. It is actually a sign of strength.
Best,


Attorney CN Ajie

Breaking news: Lawsuit Against NBA Closed Today!




Lawsuit against NBA Closed Today 23/2/2016  in the presence of Samuel Zibiri SAN and other learned colleagues. Also I saw Sunday Ameh SAN in court  and Ikeji  Esq but they were all in different matters Tues 23rd Feb 2016. Two hours ago or so, some of us left the high court feeling elated and vindicated.

STARWOOD VS- NBA
In 2013, during the regime of NBA President Okey Wali SAN, I wrote on behalf of my clients to settle an outstanding debt. NBA Section on Business Law had incurred the debt previous years before Mr Wali came to the saddle. In 2013, my clients handed me the instructions.
I thought Wali would consider mediation so I tried to settle it amicably but when he made a simple matter complicated and thought SBL should, we filed a writ of summons under the un-defended list against NBA President NBA, GS, RT. They filed a notice of intention to defend and a counter affidavit. Thereafter the NBA filed a Motion dated 30th Jan 2014 to protest that the court processes were not served on them.
It is not all the time an opponent files something a lawyer should respond except of course on points of law.  When in 2015, NBA Lawyer argued his Motion dated 30th Jan 2014, we replied on points of law. 



1.    That the NBA’s objection is frivolous, vexatious, be dismissed.

2.    That Kisari Investment Ltd vs- La Terminal Co Ltd (2001)  FWLR (PART 66) p766 at 785 relied on by NBA decided that once service of originating processes  was effected at the defendants’ office address, it is proper in the eyes of the law and therefore cannot protest.

3.    That the processes were served by Bailiff Bolus at the NBA National Secretariat at N0. 24, Oro-Ago Street, Off Muhammadu Buhari Way Abuja and received by the Director of Admin at the time Mr Osita Okoro  on 26/7/2013 and the defendants having responded thereto by filing a notice of intention to defend on 2/8 and  a counter affidavit wherein NBA said it is NBA Section on Business Law that should pay the debt and not the National NBA and we said NBA SBL is not a juristic person. Hence the parent body must be held liable for the acts of one of her arms of administration at the national level.


After the argument, the court adjourned for ruling and that was when NBA took seriously the suggestion for mediation and settlement and it paid off. However, today the court read her ruling anyway and dismissed NBA’s application bearing in mind NBA told a lie when it said it was not served. 



Anyway I have told the court because NBA stopped attending court after we got NBA’s cheque paid NBA’s legitimate debt, I on my own informed the Judge today 23/2/2016 that sums have been paid and case closed.  Judge Ordered accordingly


Thank you but next time do not treat or take mediation tips as a sign of weakness. It is actually a sign of strength.
Best,


Attorney CN Ajie