Sunday 30 December 2018

DO NOT PAY BPF 2019: EQUITY DEEMED USORO TO HAVE RESIGNED AFTER ARRAIGNMENT ON 18-12-2018

Equity takes as done that which ought to have been done. The Usoros presidency is going with 2018. Because:
Mr Usoro is facing a multi fraud charge. He ought, out of respect to the legal profession and to preserve its honour have resigned since 18/12/18 . He is henceforth taken as NOT our NBA President.

You and I are not and were not beneficiaries of the accused persons crime. Nigerian Bar Association is not a beneficiary.
All of us together cannot pay or be responsible for Usoros criminal conduct.

2018 is almost gone, 2019 pay money to Usoros presidency lose it. They intend to recoup the campaign funds they paid to those who took from them. Reason they are angry with Fmr CoS, Fmr Président ABM whom he succeeded, is that the Usoros thought once they got in they would find treasure and take it, unfortunately for them they met an empty treasury and NBA debts of half a Billion Naira. Angry about their double tragic financial losses, which PwC unearthed. Look McArthur Foundation's huge grant running into several hundreds of millions has been suspended under Usoros presidency. The Usoros cannot get it because the Foundation has suspended it so Usoros only hope is your BPF & conference fees.

Why do you think of the 3 presidential candidates all SANs Mr Usoro was the only SAN who refused to pronounce on a policy of a packet of NBA stamps free to lawyers upon payment of your BPF. Despite I wrote to him to give stamps at no extra cost. He wrote a public statement, 'no free lunch for NBA members on NBA stamps' Usoros mean spirit. That wasn't free you are paying BPF and you are entitled to a packet of NBA stamps for your legal practice.

Was the only SAN who refused to say with specifity that he will reduce the high cost of conference fees. Because the Usoros were part of the George Etomi AGC flop the Usoros were given the assignment to take care of logistics 2018 AGC and they scammed us.

Matters made worse, in money laundering cases such as the one they are facing, the State as a duty freezes the accounts of accused persons. As you know Efcc did not freeze NBA's account. So NBA would be Usoros sure Tills. Don't give them your hard earned money. Wait until the formalities for their removal is complete before you will pay bar practice fees BPF, 2019.

You will not condone that the tainted head of NBA remains in office spreading damage over innocent members of NBA. He has putrefied NBA and damaged our corporate reputation and we won't carry that liability thru 2019 the new year. Hence the incoming regime stays till 2020 when the NBA presidential Tripod will move from East to West and North in that order.

Yours respectfully,
C N AJIE ESQ.

Tuesday 25 December 2018

LAWYERS LIVES MATTER!

Season's Greetings the Usoros wrote their official Christmas message as
"SEASON GREETINGS".
 Apostrophe - those punctuation marks are good on NBA messages.

NOTE:
Two Lawyers were arrested at Christmas 2018 in Lagos not a word from Usoro SAN
A Lawyer was shot in the course of preparations for the funeral of our learned colleague Reuben James who died before Christmas and not a word of condolence from Mr. Usoro. Reuben James was NBA 3rd VP. He was a GS Candidate in 2014.
He was an active supporter of one of the NBA presidential candidates in 2018 against the Usoros and do members not reserve the right to support candidates of choice?.
Is that why you won't condole with the families of our deceased members?.
And they didn't even contact NBA Kaduna Branch where deceased was till death.
Don't you have respect for the dignity of the human person and our lives?.
LAWYERS' LIVES MATTER!

Wednesday 19 December 2018

USORO WAS NOT SARAKI'S ONLY LAWYER!


Paul Usoro was one of the many lawyers, (106 Lawyers in number). Paul Usoro, Paul Erokoro and others were brought by the lead counsel Distinguished Senior Advocate of Nigeria Senator Kanu Agabi SAN to join him in the CCT criminal case that Senate President Saraki had faced at the time. Why Paul Usoro SAN?
It is quite appalling for Paul Usoro, LLB(Hons) Ife, SAN, FCIArb(Nigeria) to issue characteristically unscholarly attacks, and now on EFCC for arraigning him yesterday 18/12 before Hon. Justice Hassan of Federal High Court, Lagos the Usoros major place of work where suspicious accounts are domiciled.

I never applied for Judgeship and thrice I was offered Federal High Court Bench few years ago I declined politely. And Delta State High Court Bench I turned it down politely many years ago. Even SAN I never filed SAN application for consideration particularly after my Georgetown scholarship program. It was when I wasn’t forthcoming they gave it to two learned ladies who shall herein not be named (2012, 2013 during regime of the first female CJN).  South West is home for me. South South is home too! North my place of birth; Igbo a good tribe hated by those who seek to exterminate the Igbos in NBA. Those who plot to suffocate industrious lawyers will have their tribal sword turned against them.

That is why Senator Kanu Agabi SAN you all know him, excellent  Counsel, One of the Best Lawyers in present times. Why is Agabi SAN not with Usoros defence team?. Because Agabi does not believe Usoro has a valid and legitimate defence to the criminal charges of money laundering and corruption!.

The Usoros wrote a letter dated 17th Dec., 2018 to the Hon Chief Judge of the Federal High Court that Hon Justice Hassan in Lagos should not preside (is Usoro not presiding in NBA). His case was to come up on 18-12-2018 he wrote only on 17/12, ostensibly after failed attempts to reach an incorruptible Judge.

Hon Justice Hassan’s offence is His Lordship’s dedication to judicial duties and mastery of criminal proceedings  these are the qualities the Usoros ignobly fail to commend, a Judge who adjourned from 10-12-18 to 18-12-18 for his arraignment despite that Usoro SAN evaded service of the processes. EFCC never detained you for 48 hours not even for 24 hours, you may have been detained as a guest of the state.  EFCC allowed you administrative bail on liberal terms and you are there insulting EFCC for treating you with kids gloves and you are there unhappy about Hon. Justice Hassan’s Nobility, Learnedness and Impartiality because His Lordship ‘cannot be reached’ by you Mr “Fix-it” and your other Messrs “Fixes-it”.  

You are so WRONG USOROS WRONG! For it is right for a Judge such as Hon Justice Hassan to be fair to an accused person such as Usoro He granted you bail quickly and he insisted EFCC should not detain you and asked that you be released to Offiong SAN pending the perfection of your bail.
You are just holding on to straws in order to hold on to the NBA Presidency.
Exit NBA to face your trial or NBA will exit you!

Now here are excerpts from thecable online on Agabi SAN why you? EFCC left Kanu Agabi the lead counsel in Saraki’s case to chase you? You LIES!. LIES! EFCC came for you FOR BREAKING the laws of the land & you should be putting your answer seriatim rather than provoking contempt proceedings!

The Excerpts from TheCable online on:
KANU AGABI
Agabi (SAN), a former attorney-general of the federation (AGF), brought humour, dexterity and tact to Saraki’s trial. He also brought one other thing to the trial – 106 lawyers – which he often said was the largest consortium of legal professionals handling a single case in Nigeria.

Agabi teamed up with three other senior lawyers – KK Eleja, Paul Usoro and Paul Erokoro –  in the trial. When the courtroom is bursting with heated arguments and tension, Agabi would make a wisecrack to bring calm to the situation. He took the trial through a causal path despite the enormity of the charges.  He also brought control and legal gravitas to the occasion.
Although the tribunal dismissed two of the applications he filed for the discharge of Saraki, he never resorted to verbal brawls to express his displeasure. The CCT judge and the lead prosecution counsel accorded him respect, perhaps because of his age and experience, but most importantly because his gentle disposition to cutting issues. On Wednesday, he won his case for the senate president.” THECABLE ONLINE  JUNE 14, 2018



Tuesday 18 December 2018

History Made: Paul Usoro SAN Arraigned Today Over Money Laundering and Corruption Charges


History made Learned ladies and Learned gentlemen. About an hour ago the NBA Président Usoro SAN was arraigned before the Fédéral High Court Lagos. He fought so hard to stall it but couldnt. Thru his lawyer he argued that they had written to the CJ to move the case to FHC Uyo. Hon. Justice Hassan said His Lordship gave no such directives and he was going on with the arraignment.

Upon being arraigned the First NBA Président made to answer money laundering and corruption charges. Usoro took his plea. His lawyer argued his bail application and asked for bail on self recognizance. The EFCC Brilliant Prosecutor Rotimi resisted them and eventually bail was granted in the sum of N250million by His Lordship Hon Justice Hassan who ordered the défendant to produce à surety. His Lordship said pending the perfection of his bail bond Mr Usoro should be released to Mr Offiong SAN one of the accused person's Counsel.

Attendance in court was not nearly as heavy as it was the First time the case was called 10-12. Only 4 or 5 SANs stood up for the defendant today out of a Number of 400+ SANs in Nigeria.

Heroic decision of EFCC to bring Usoros to book. Hopefully this should act as deterrence to Lawyers acting as conduit to pilfer on budgetary sums meant for the common man and thé common woman and certainly infrastructural development.

Thank you

C N AJIE ESQ

Monday 17 December 2018

Prof Ojukwu's FoI Lawsuit and Usoro's Transparency Raillery!


The NBA President must know how to attach documents to his emails. He is an ICT Law Expert. 

Prof Ojukwu files Freedom of Information Law suit and the NBA President refers to some of the documents Ojukwu seeks to query in his email as having being uploaded  on NBA website such as PwC Auditors report. Usoro also reference NBA Communique 6th Dec 2018 in his email below as being there for “any member” to see his words “any member” said repeatedly that is a derogatory reference; NBA members are our greatest assets,  derogatory of  one whose legitimacy to the NBA office he occupies is the subject matter of civil litigation and disputation  by Okafor who believes there was internet fraud and massive manipulation of votes. Not mentioning NBA ICT Chams Plc pending criminal investigation and possible prosecution by EFCC under the CYBERCRIMES ACT 2015.

Now Mr Usoro responds to Ojukwu’s suit via email  below to NBA Members whom he addresses as “Dear Sir/Ma”.  Don’t you know must know how to address your professional colleagues Mr President? He says he has advance copy of EO’s Writ and would file his defence when he is served. He says some of the documents are on NBA website anyways. What does that mean? He wants to be personally served by a Court Bailiff. Why don’t you rather proceed to the Court and collect your copy from the Sheriff’s office considering you have the suit number and parties and venue of litigation & a copy of the Writ.

You failed to see that uploading documents online is not the same as the attachment of the documents to your email, the latter serves as the recipient’s copy incapable of being altered and saved in his or her file for future references. When you post materials on a website Lawyers do not have the password only the ICT team has the password. The ICT team upon the President’s instructions could unilaterally make alterations, modifications, amendments or even completely delete it because the access button is controlled thereat. In contrast the attached copy to our learned colleagues is saved and printable and becomes part of your files and cannot be deleted externally. Usoro is ICT Law expert he must know the hall mark of transparency and accountability is to allow each Lawyer individual copy through emails or printed in addition to what you have uploaded on NBA website.

Why is it easier for Usoro to attach Whatsapp screenshots of his text messages to other presidential candidates Ojukwu and Okafor in Aug 2018 than to attach some documents to his email below.

Furthermore, Mr Usoro SAN said of Professor Ernest Ojukwu’s FoI Lawsuit, a number of the documents or queries refer to transactions that took place before he was declared NBA President and sworn-in August 2018 and Usoro asked Ojukwu why did you not send your FoI requests to those who were in office at the time? Why now? That is a good question my President being clever by half. What does the law say about regimes and continuum? If you don’t have the files Ojukwu requested for, why didn’t you respond to those you have and referred others you don’t in a reply to FoI request that with reference to paragraphs XYZ we have sent your FoI request to NBA President at the time  Mahmoud SAN or Alegeh or a named administration in office at the time unless you are saying you don’t even know in whose regime the events or transactions took place. Puts your NBA Greenery to Mockery.

Mr Usoro SAN should have responded to  Ojukwu’s FoI request when he received it  and this FoI litigation would not have been necessary but as usual Usoros presidency prefers scandalizing our NBA through incompetences in handling professional and administrative matters and simple inquiries by those whose right it is to know about happenings in a great association that belongs to all LAWYERS!
Best
C N AJIE ESQ




On Sunday, December 16, 2018, 7:29:34 PM GMT+1, Nigerian Bar Association <info1@nigerianbar.org.ng> wrote:


Dear Sir/Ma,
16 December 2018
  
1.       Introductory Remarks
1.1     Our attention has been drawn to the social media buzz and reports in regard to Professor Ernest Ojukwu, SAN’s Freedom of Information (“FOI”) Suit against the Nigerian Bar Association (“NBA”).  Professor Ojukwu indeed sent me by e-mail, last night, 15 December 2018, the advance filed copies of his processes in the said Suit and, true to his acknowledgement in his open and published letter to me dated 22 November 2018, “out of the 15 items” set out in his Suit, “only two are activities of the present leadership, that is to say,
1.    “Report of the NBA 2018 Ad-hoc Transition Committee; and
2.    “The contract signed by NBA to engage the services of PricewaterhouseCooper (PWC) for the purpose of auditing and reviewing the NBA account”.
1.2     Without prejudice to the merits or demerits of Professor Ojukwu’s Suit, it is apropos that we point out that our administration has made transparency and accountability the touchstone and indeed the cornerstone of our NBA National leadership.  We were the ones who harped the most on these corporate governance principles during the campaigns for NBA offices and, in office, we embrace and practice these values on a daily basis, right from Day One of our administration. 
1.3     This is evident in our preparation and publication of the NBA Financial Statements as at 31 August 2018 and in respect of Quarter 1 of 2018/2019 which ended on 31 October 2018.  These publications that were made with full disclosures, were made under no compulsion from any person or quarter; they were made voluntarily and because we believed and still believe that such transparency conforms with international best corporate governance practices which the NBA must imbibe and entrench.

2.       PwC Engagement
2.1     In specific regard to the PwC engagement – one of the two items in Professor Ojukwu’s list that relate to “the present leadership” –that issue was tabled before NEC at its last meeting on 06 December 2018 and Items 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the NEC Communique which has been published to and for all NBA members (and may be downloaded by any member from the NBA website) capture the NEC decisions thereon thus:
11.         “NBA Financial Management. NEC ratifies the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) by the Usoro-led administration for the preparation of the 31 August 2018 Financial Statement and the Finance Function Diagnostic Report for a combined fee of N7,000,000.00 (Seven Million Naira only).  Both the 31 August 2018 Financial Statement and the Finance Function Diagnostic Report had been circulated to members earlier and was being presented to NEC at this meeting.  NEC adopts both documents and urges the National Officers to implement the recommendations therein contained,
12.         “NEC further ratifies the engagement of PwC for the interim preparation of the NBA quarterly financial statements pending the hiring of experienced and knowledgeable in-house personnel to man the Association’s finance functions.  The Usoro-led administration had negotiated a fee of N600,000.00 per quarter for this assignment and that amount was ratified by NEC.

13.         “NEC adopts the 2018/2019 Q1 Financial Statement that was presented by the Usoro-led administration and commends the administration for laying emphasis on transparency and accountability in the management of the Association’s finances.”

14.         “NEC emphasizes the need for financial transparency, accountability and prudence in the management of the Association’s finances and commends the Usoro-led administration for its stringent and prudent spending and financial management policy. It emphasized the need for financial efficiency and discipline in the management of the Association’s affairs as a way of institutionalizing corporate governance in the NBA body polity.”

2.2     As regards the scope of PwC services pursuant to their engagement, we had made full disclosure thereof in our published Release of 06 October 2018 in which we announced the PwC engagement.  It is necessary that we reproduce the opening paragraph of our said Statement which, again,may be downloaded by any member from the NBA website, viz:

1.       “On Thursday, 03 October 2018, we commenced our promised march towards a financially accountable and transparent NBA Administration by executing a Letter of Engagement (“LoE”) with PriceWaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”), the international accounting firm.  Just so there is no ambiguity or doubt as to our expectations and prospective gains from the PwC assignment, we reproduce below the Detailed Project Scope/Work Plan as excerpted from the LoE:

“APPENDIX 1 – Detailed Project Scope/Work Plan

S/N
Phase and Activities
Deliverables
Timelines
1.
Preparation of Financial Statements
1.
  • Obtain relevant financial information including:
    • Previous year’s business for current and non-current assets, current and non-current liabilities, and net assets
    • Current year’s trial balance
    • Supporting schedules for current year’s trial balance, accounts, ledgers, and sub-ledgers
    • Bank statements, bank account and ledger account reconciliations
    • Fixed asset register including information on classes of assets, purchase dates, asset particulars, location etc.
  • Review and validate key financial statement line items (including non-current assets, liabilities, inventory and cash); ensure that they reconcile back to adequate support documentation and schedules, ledgers and sub-ledgers
  • Prepare and pass appropriate adjustment journal entries for various accounts, ledgers and sub-ledgers and update the respective schedules accordingly
  • Prepare updated trial balance and financial statement for period from 1 to 31 August 2018
For period under review
  • Updated trial balance and supporting schedules
  • Financial statements
4 weeks
2.
Finance Function Review
 
 
  • Gather data and other relevant information through interviews and walkthroughs to gain understanding of and insight into the current finance operations and processes
  • Assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the finance function and its operating model including its:
    • Revenue collections
    • Payment processes
    • Treasury management
    • Enabling technology
  • Identify gaps, areas of inefficiencies, revenue leakages, control weaknesses, risk exposures, and make recommendations to address them
  • Finance function diagnostic report (including findings and improvement opportunities)
2 weeks
3.       Transition Committee Report
3.1     On the Transition Committee Report – the second of the two items on Professor Ojukwu’s list that relate to “the present leadership” of the NBA –this issue was also discussed at the last NEC meeting and we reproduce below from the widely published NEC Communique(again, this may be downloaded by any member from the NBA website) the NEC decision thereon:
15.         “At the request of the President, NEC agrees to step down discussions on the Report of the Transition Committee that was constituted to, amongst others, carry out preparatory transition assignments that would aid and facilitate the smooth take-off of the Usoro-led administration.  This was to allow the persons who had complained of not having been heard by the Committee to be so heard.  NEC further agrees that the Report would be presented to and discussed at the next NEC meeting.”

3.2     Clearly, the consideration of the Transition Committee Report is a work-in-progress and it is, in our respectful opinion, only right that the Report be published only after (a) all relevant parties have been heard thereon; and (b) NEC is given the opportunity to deliberate upon the Report and give directions thereon.  Shall we publish the Transition Committee Report thereafter? Most definitely.  But we believe that the processes outlined above should be concluded ahead of any such publication.

4.       Conclusion

4.1     As we stated earlier, our comments here are without prejudice to the merits (or demerits) of Professor Ojukwu’s Suit.  We only seek to establish that (a) transparency and full disclosure has been our ethos from Day 1 of this administration and, by God’s Grace, shall so remain for the remainder of our 2-year term in office; (b) issues relating to the PwC engagement, which Professor Ojukwu has publicly acknowledged is one of the “only two . . . activities of the present leadership” “out of the 15 items” in his Suit, have already been transparently disclosed and are currently in the public domain; and (c) the Transition Committee Report remains a work-in-progress and would be published in due time pursuant to and in the terms of Resolution 19 of the Communique of the NEC Meeting of 06 December 2018.

4.2     In regard to the Items in Professor Ojukwu’s Suit that predate our administration which, it would appear, is Professor Ojukwu’s circuitous process for the probing of the previous administration(s), we are wondering why Professor Ojukwu did not demand for these disclosures from those administration(s) that had responsibilities therefor when they were in office.  In any case, we would enter the NBA defense to the Suit generally, as necessary and required, in due time and after we have been served with the processes.


Paul Usoro, SAN
President

Sunday 16 December 2018

MONEY LAUNDERING: Court Orders Zuma to Refund Legal Fees!

The State paid approximately $2.2million in legal fees to the South African Lawyers who had appeared for President Zuma in the money laundering and corruption charges against him in Court. Now he has to cough it up!.  Click:
The South African Court has held that Zuma must pay back the money to the State. President Zuma was initially told to resign as a result of his criminal cases, to go and face his criminal prosecution but he delayed and just before his political colleagues in ANC would take the next step to force him out, he resigned in February 2018.

Teaching Moments:
 1.  Zuma was reprimanded because he took money from the State Treasury to pay his Lawyers who fought his criminal matters of corruption, money laundering, now Zuma  has been ordered to refund approx $2.2million to the state account.

2.  Usoro appear to have a scheme up his sleeves, after stalling his arraignment  Monday 10-12 and the court adjourned to Tues 18-12 for arraignment and to take his plea and bail, he and his lawyers are yet to file his Bail application. He has been served the charge sheet since Monday 10-12 when he was not arraigned at the FHC Lagos as a result of his evasion of service of the charge sheet. A Journalist called one of his lawyers to inquire why a bail application was not filed and the lawyer retorted "we have our plans" said that thrice said. This case is a public scrutiny of the man at the helm of NBA who has refused to resign like President Zuma to face his offNBA actions until Zuma was to be forced out by his party, and he stepped down.

3.  Mr Paul Usoro’s passport seized over corruption and money laundering charges and inventory of his properties under watch. He cannot travel to attend Int’l events, he will not attend IBA Council meetings at this time or any IBA Conference until his criminal matters have been concluded and if he is convicted he will not be able to practice, he will stand disbarred and the name Paul Usoro SAN will be struck out the roll of legal practitioners. Will set some precedents for Lawyers not to model on ML.

4.  His lawyer thinks that being the President of NBA grants license to misconduct. No! Are you not aware that even in civil cases, Lawyers are not to present their  cases if they were litigants, from the Bar, much more criminal matters such as this!.  

5.  Usoro and his Lawyer must desist from attempts to use the toga of NBA in these proceedings, party in litigation(s) not above the law.  Usoro is a criminal suspect and parties are all equal before the law, a fortiori if he has no bail application pending and granted, well then he deserves to stay as a guest of the state.

6. Should Mr Usoro abscond from his arraignment on Tuesday and decides to send his Counsel to argue anticipated frivolous preliminary objection(the Courts have held all preliminary objections should be taken with your criminal trial such that it is when you get to address stage that you and the prosecutor will address the court), so  Usoro risks a Bench Warrant being issued to compel his attendance to answer to serious economic crimes TEN COUNTS! Usoros hands in the tills in flagrante delicto.
 
All the Best
CN AJIE ESQ.

Friday 14 December 2018

12 UK Law Firms Shut Down Over Money Laundering Activities - FT


Those 12 defending Paul Usoro Tues please Brothers be careful and watch see when you withdraw your appearances from money laundering cases so that it is not said birds of the same feather flock.  No more defendants now  listen to UK Security Minister Ben Wallace who said he was going to bring the full force of the law to bear on lawyers who work for criminal politicians who collude to dip into state treasury to take what is meant for service to the masses  “....report  suspicious (and fraudulent) activities that may involve overly secretive clients, high-value cash transactions and clients acting through third parties.” - Financial Times March 2018

Ibori's Lawyer Bhadresh Gohil was jailed by a Crown Court in England for 7 years involving $37m scam.




Ibori‘s lawyer to spend seven years in UK jail - Gistmania
mary123
Ibori‘s lawyer to spend seven years in UK jailFont size: Decrease font Enlarge fontOur Reporter 10/03/2011 00:58...