Tuesday 30 August 2016

Agbakoba to Magu: 'Let's Have a Debate on Efficacy of Prosecuting Agency!'



STATEMENT BY HURILAWS DATED 30TH AUGUST 2016
TRANSMITTED BY EMAIL FROM hurilaws@hurilaws.org
==============================
HURILAWS SUPPORTS REASSESSING PROSECUTING POWERS OF THE EFCC
The Human Rights Law Service (HURILAWS) applauds the call by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association, A.B. Mahmoud SAN for a debate on the efficacy of the war against corruption in Nigeria. Where corruption is endemic like in Nigeria strong institutions are critical to achieve success. It is in this context that the debate on the propriety of the EFCC investigating and prosecuting financial crimes at the same time is appropriate. 

We support the position of the President of the Nigerian Bar Association. HURILAWS position is supported by international best practice and the need to build the capacity of the EFCC to deliver on its core mandate which is investigation of financial crimes. The international best practice is that one agency investigates, another prosecutes and the court adjudicates. The EFCC as currently composed is overworked and will not efficiently deliver on investigation and prosecution. 

Whilst we have no objection with the EFCC investigating or the courts adjudicating, we believe the powers to prosecute should be vested in an independent highly resourced prosecuting agency. We appreciate the enormous work done by the EFCC since its establishment in 2003. 13 years on the Federal Government needs to rejig the EFCC and other crime fighting institutions to perform optimally. We support plan by the Attorney General of the Federation to establish a National Prosecuting Agency.            
Olisa Agbakoba SAN                  Collins Okeke
Senior Counsel                         Legal/Programme Officer
==============================
Senior Legal/Programme Officer
Left Wing, 1st Floor 34 Creek Road, P.O. Box 3169, Apapa-Lagos, Nigeria.
Tel: 234 4741081

Fax: 234-545-4554

Mahmoud to Magu: ‘I Was Not Ibori’s Lawyer & Insulting Language From a Public Institution is Unacceptable!!




Mahmoud SAN to Magu: ‘I Was Not Ibori’s Lawyer & Insulting Language From a Public Institution is Unacceptable!’

NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION REACTION TO EFCC STATEMENT ISSUED SATURDAY 27TH AUGUST, 2016

1. The attention of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has been
drawn to the statements issued by the Economic and Financial
Crimes Commission (EFCC) said to be in response to the
Inaugural Address of the President of the NBA made in Port -
Harcourt, Rivers State on Friday 26th August, 2016.

2. I t has become necessary to react to the statements given its
unduly harsh and negative tone totally uncalled for when in the
culture of any democratic society, debates about the nature,
character and responsibilities of public institutions must always
be encouraged.

3. The Inaugural Address of the NBA President was a statement of nearly 30 pages, which sets out his vision and the direct ion of his programmes for the Nigerian legal profession. He commit ted
himself to leading a brave new bar fully aligned with the aspirations of Nigerians in their quest for national development
which can only be anchored on the rule of law built on strong
institutions.

4. In the one paragraph of the statement dealing with corrupt ion, the NBA President restated the commitment of the NBA in the fight against corruption. He commended the modest achievements of the EFCC but called for the reform of the Agency to enhance its capabilities to deliver on its mandate on a ‘consistent and sustainable’ basis devoid of political interference and on the basis of well -established institutional safeguards that demand the proper regulation of the wide discretionary powers involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal matters.

5. Combining investigative powers with prosecutorial powers in one single agency, (called the Roskill Model in England), is the
exception rather than the norm. In the UK only the Serious Fraud
Office (SFO) enjoys such combined powers. But given the
institutional safeguards, both within the SFO and the maturity that characterizes the UK Criminal Justice Institutions, the abuse of such powers will be highly unlikely.

6. The NBA Constitution demands that it promotes law reform and
legal development . It therefore commits itself to promoting
healthy public debate about our institutions and interrogating
their capabilities and performance, including ALL criminal just ice
agencies such as the EFCC. The NBA will not be intimidated or
cowed in the discharge of this responsibility.

7. The NBA condemns in the strongest terms the use of abusive and uncivil language of ‘rogues and vultures’ and such strictures by a public authority. Name calling and use of abusive language is not expected of any public institution. It is unacceptable. The NBA demands unequivocal withdrawal of this statement and an
unreserved apology from the EFCC.

8. The NBA calls on the EFCC to also endeavor to get its facts
correct before making statements or insinuations.

9. The NBA President Mr. A.B. Mahmoud, SAN has over the years supported the work of the EFCC in many ways and acted as counsel in a number of matters on behalf of the organization.

10. However, neither he nor his firm has ever represented the EFCC or the Attorney General of the Federation or been involved in any prosecution or defense of Mr. James Ibori in any criminal matter before any court in Nigeria or outside.

11. On the case involving the former Governor of Rivers State, Mr
Peter Odili the EFCC is aware that Mr. Mahmoud was lead
counsel in its defense in a civil appeal at the Court of Appeal
involving the constitutional challenge of the powers of the EFCC
by the Rivers State Government . In spite of his best efforts, the
case has remained stuck in the Court of Appeal , even after all
briefs of arguments had been settled. The records of the EFCC
will also show that neither Mr. Mahmoud nor his firm has been
paid any fee, notwithstanding the nearly 20 court appearances in
the matter in the course of the last several years involving air
travels (Abuja to Port Harcourt ) and hotel expenses.

12. It is therefore unkind and misleading for the EFCC to suggest that Mr. Mahmoud was ever involved in any way in the conduct of its criminal cases against any of the two former Governors.

DATED 29TH AUGUST, 2016

____________________________
ISIAKA ABIOLA OLAGUNJU, ESQ.
GENERAL SECRETARY
NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION